Mn1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome

Watchlist
Retrieved
2021-01-18
Source
Trials
Genes
Drugs

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Individuals with MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome have mild-to-moderate intellectual disability, severe expressive language delay, dysmorphic facial features (midface hypoplasia, downslanting palpebral fissures, hypertelorism, exophthalmia, short upturned nose, and small low-set ears), and distinctive findings on brain imaging (including perisylvian polymicrogyria and atypical rhombencephalosynapsis). Mild-to-moderate prelingual hearing loss (usually bilateral, conductive, and/or sensorineural) is common. Generalized seizures (observed in the minority of individuals) are responsive to antiepileptic drugs. There is an increased risk for craniosynostosis and, thus, increased intracranial pressure. To date, 25 individuals with MCTT syndrome have been identified.

Diagnosis/testing.

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for MCTT syndrome have been published. The diagnosis is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in MN1 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Multidisciplinary specialists to help manage developmental delay / intellectual disability, feeding issues, seizures, hearing loss, and speech and language needs, especially alternative communication.

Surveillance: Routine follow up by multidisciplinary specialists per their recommendations.

Genetic counseling.

MCTT syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo MN1 pathogenic variant. The risk to the sibs of a proband depends on the genetic status of the proband's parents: if the MN1 pathogenic variant found in the proband cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the recurrence risk to sibs is estimated to be slightly greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of parental somatic/germline mosaicism. Prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk and preimplantation genetic testing are possible once the MN1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member.

Diagnosis

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome have been published.

Suggestive Findings

MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical findings and brain MRI findings.

Clinical findings

  • Intellectual disability (ID) with severe expressive language delay
  • Hypotonia
  • Delays in motor development
  • Hearing loss (conductive or sensorineural)
  • Distinctive craniofacial features (see Figure 1)
Figure 1. . Facial features of individuals with C-terminal truncating variants in MN1, illustrating how features evolve from before to after age five years.

Figure 1.

Facial features of individuals with C-terminal truncating variants in MN1, illustrating how features evolve from before to after age five years. Frontal bossing may be more prominent at infancy, with a tall forehead at later stages. Skull shape anomalies (more...)

Brain MRI findings. In MCTT syndrome, an atypical distinctive form of rhombencephalosynapsis is observed in which there is partial or complete loss of the cerebellar vermis landmarks with fusion of the cerebellar hemispheres characterized by abnormal midline crossing of cerebellar folia and white matter tracts. Other distinctive brain MRI findings are summarized in Table 1 (see Figure 2 and Figure 3).

Figure 2. . Partial rhombencephalosynapsis in patients with C-terminal truncating MN1 variants.

Figure 2.

Partial rhombencephalosynapsis in patients with C-terminal truncating MN1 variants. Changes of the cerebellum include foliar dysplasia, abnormal folia crossing the midline, and small or almost absent vermis. For details, refer to Figure 4 of Mak et al (more...)

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Persistent trigeminal artery and prominent posterior clinoid process in patients with C-terminal truncating MN1 variants A. Carotid and basilar arteries (axial view): persistent trigeminal artery flow-voids (dark signal) connecting the carotid (C) and (more...)

Table 1.

Brain Imaging Features in Individuals with MCTT Syndrome

FeaturePrevalence
Perisylvian polymicrogyria 19/10
Rhombencephalosynapsis8/10
Persistent trigeminal artery7/10
Prominent posterior clinoid process7/10
Thick rostral corpus callosum6/11
Hypoplastic olfactory bulbs4/8
Ventriculomegaly3/11
Subcortical heterotopia2/11

Based on 11 MRIs reviewed at one center [Mak et al 2020]

1.

Observed in insula; can sometimes extend more broadly in perisylvian region.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in MN1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 2).

Note: Identification of a heterozygous MN1 variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis of this disorder.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing and multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.

Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Individuals with the distinctive craniofacial or brain MRI findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those in whom the diagnosis of MCTT syndrome has not been considered are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).

Option 1

Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of MN1 is performed first to detect small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants. Note: Depending on the sequencing method used, single-exon, multiexon, or whole-gene deletions/duplications may not be detected. Typically, if no variant is detected by the sequencing method used, the next step is to perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect exon and whole-gene deletions or duplications; however, since MCTT occurs through a gain-of-function mechanism and large intragenic deletion or duplication has not been reported, testing for intragenic deletions or duplication is much less likely to identify a disease-causing variant given the current understanding.

Note: To date all described variants have been C-terminal truncating variants at the 3' end of exon 1 or in exon 2.

An intellectual disability multigene panel that includes MN1 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. Given that MCTT syndrome is quite rare and only recently identified, some intellectual disability panels may not include MN1. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

Comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene(s) are likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 2.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome

Gene 1MethodProportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method
MN1Sequence analysis 324/24 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5None reported 4
1.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.

Mak et al [2020], Miyake et al [2020]

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

To date, 25 individuals have been identified with a germline (de novo or inherited from a mosaic parent) pathogenic C-terminal variant in MN1 [Mak et al 2020, Miyake et al 2020]. Individuals with MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome have intellectual disability, severe expressive language delay, dysmorphic facial features (see Figure 1), and distinctive findings on brain imaging (including perisylvian polymicrogyria and atypical rhombencephalosynapsis) (see Table 1). The summary of the phenotypic features associated with MCTT syndrome in Table 3 is based on these reports.

Table 3.

Clinical Features of MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome

FeaturePersons w/Feature
Intellectual disability19/20 (95%)
Motor delay19/20 (95%)
Speech delay21/23 (91%)
Hypotonia19/21 (90%)
Hearing loss16/20 (80%)
Feeding difficulties14/21 (67%)
Spinal anomalies8/12 (67%)
Dental anomalies9/15 (60%)
Ophthalmologic anomalies10/17 (59%)
Cardiovascular anomalies6/20 (30%)
Seizures6/22 (27%)
Craniosynostosis3/22 (14%)

Based on Mak et al [2020] and Miyake et al [2020]

Developmental delay (DD) / intellectual disability (ID). Individuals with MCTT syndrome have mild-to-moderate intellectual disability and severe expressive language delay. The majority have nonverbal communication with notable exceptions. For example, one child was able to speak at age two years, and at age 14 years was able to function at the level of a seven-year-old. For others, single-word speech began between ages three and six years. Some can communicate in sign language with up to 50 signs [Mak et al 2020].

Delay in gross motor development included hypotonia; at least four of 22 children walked independently by age two to three years. Others required orthotics or a wheelchair for mobilization. As for fine motor and self-help skills, most individuals require help with writing, feeding, or dressing [Mak et al 2020].

Hearing loss, when present, is mild to moderate and prelingual. It is usually bilateral, conductive, and/or sensorineural. Dysplasia of the cochlea, semicircular canals, and bony structures of the middle ear (e.g., incus) has been reported.

Feeding difficulties are more prominent early in infancy and may resolve after the first year of life. Hyperphagia has also been reported in three children [Miyake et al 2020].

Spinal anomalies include lordosis, scoliosis, or kyphosis, which may be detected clinically or by imaging.

Dental anomalies can include conical teeth, crowded teeth, and serrated teeth. Malocclusion has also been reported.

Ophthalmologic anomalies can include oculomotor defects, strabismus, and/or shallow orbits, giving the appearance of exorbitism.

Cardiovascular anomalies include atrial septal defect or ventricular septal defects.

Seizures are generalized and may be myoclonic in nature. Among the six individuals with seizures, the majority were isolated events and were responsive to antiepileptic drugs. While polymicrogyria may be associated with increased risk of seizures, more information is needed.

Craniosynostosis. Individuals with MCTT syndrome are at increased risk for craniosynostosis with no specific pattern to the sutures affected. Although head circumference is normal in individuals with craniosynostosis, head shape is consistently affected. Skull shape anomalies that may be observed with or without underlying craniosynostosis include dolichocephaly, turricephaly, and/or bitemporal narrowing, plagiocephaly, and macrocephaly. Individuals with craniosynostosis are at increased risk for elevated intracranial pressure.

Behavioral problems. While some affected individuals may experience frustration due to poor verbal communication, no consistent behavior problems have been reported. The natural history into adulthood has not yet been delineated.

Growth. Growth parameters tend to remain within the normal range.

Prognosis. It is unknown if life span is affected in MCTT syndrome. One individual is alive at age 21 years [Mak et al 2020]. An unreported male is well at age 39 years [Angela Lin, personal commmunication], demonstrating that survival into adulthood is possible. Since many adults with disabilities have not undergone advanced genetic testing, it is likely that adults with this condition are unrecognized and underreported.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

No genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified.

Nomenclature

MCTT syndrome is referred to as CEBALID (craniofacial defects, dysmorphic ears, structural brain abnormalities, expressive language delay, and impaired intellectual development) syndrome in OMIM (OMIM 618774).

Prevalence

To date, 25 individuals with MCTT syndrome have been reported [Mak et al 2020, Miyake et al 2020]. This disorder is expected to be rare; the prevalence among individuals with unexplained developmental disorders is estimated at 4.2:10,000 (see bioRxiv).

Differential Diagnosis

Gomez-Lopez-Hernandez syndrome (GLHS) (OMIM 601853). Like MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome, GLHS is associated with turricephaly, midface hypoplasia, craniosynostosis, and rhombencephalosynapsis. Unlike MCTT syndrome, GLHS is also known to be associated with trigeminal anesthesia, scalp alopecia, corneal opacities, short stature, and ataxia. The genetic cause of GLHS is unknown.

Management

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 4.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
ConstitutionalMeasure height, weight, & head circumference.
Craniofacial
  • Dental eval
  • Oral-maxillofacial eval
Incl:
  • Dental anomalies (e.g., conical teeth, crowded teeth, malocclusion)
  • Palate for submucous cleft assoc w/bifid uvula
  • Cranial exam & skull radiographs for craniosynostosis
  • CT if indicated
There is ↑ risk for craniosynostosis & ↑ intracranial pressure.
NeurologicNeurologic eval
  • Brain MRI to identify polymicrogyria (possibly assoc w/seizure risk) & persistent trigeminal artery (possible risks for neurosurgical procedures involving skull base & pituitary)
  • EEG, if seizures present
DevelopmentDevelopmental assessment
  • Incl motor, adaptive, cognitive, & speech/language eval
  • Eval for early intervention / special education
Speech & languageSpeech-language therapistAnticipate need for augmentative communication incl sign language.
Psychiatric/
Behavioral
Assessment by primary care provider
  • No consistent behavior problems reporte
  • Some may experience frustration due to poor verbal communication.
MusculoskeletalOrthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT/OT evaluationIncl assessment of:
  • Spinal involvement (lordosis, scoliosis, kyphosis)
  • Need for PT (to improve gross motor skills) &/or OT (to improve fine motor skills)
Gastrointestinal/
Feeding
Gastroenterology / nutrition / feeding team evalIncl eval of aspiration risk & nutritional status
EyesOphthalmologic evalTo assess for ↓ vision, oculomotor defects, strabismus, or shallow orbits
HearingAudiologic eval
  • Assess for conductive &/or sensorineural hearing loss.
  • If present, refer to otolaryngologist.
CardiovascularCardiology evalFor congenital heart defects, most commonly ASD & VSD
Genetic counselingBy genetics professionals 1To inform affected individuals & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of MCTT syndrome to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Family support/
resources
Assess:
  • Use of community or online resources such as Parent to Parent;
  • Need for social work involvement for parental support.

ASD = atrial septal defect; MOI = mode of inheritance; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy; VSD = ventricular septal defects

1.

Medical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, or certified advanced genetic nurse

Treatment of Manifestations

Table 5.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
CraniofacialPer oral-maxillofacial & neurosurgical specialist
Developmental delay /
Intellectual disability
See Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues.W/emphasis on alternative (nonverbal) communication
Speech & languageAlternative communication as needed
EpilepsyStandardized treatment w/AEDs by experienced neurologist
  • Many AEDs may be effective; none demonstrated effective specifically for this disorder.
  • Education of parents/caregivers 1
Poor weight gain /
Failure to thrive
Feeding therapyLow threshold for clinical feeding eval &/or radiographic swallowing study when showing clinical signs or symptoms of dysphagia
MusculoskeletalOrthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT/OT
  • Incl stretching to help avoid contractures & falls
  • Consider need for positioning & mobility devices, disability parking placard.
Abnormal vision
&/or strabismus
Standard treatment(s) per ophthalmologist
Hearing
  • Hearing aids may be helpful; per audiologist.
  • See also Hereditary Hearing Loss and Deafness Overview.
Community hearing services through early intervention or school district
CardiovascularPer treating cardiologist
Family/Community
  • Ensure appropriate social work involvement to connect families w/local resources, respite, & support.
  • Coordinate care to manage multiple subspecialty appointments, equipment, medications, & supplies.

AED = antiepileptic drug; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy

1.

Education of parents/caregivers regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for children diagnosed with epilepsy, see Epilepsy & My Child Toolkit.

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • IEP services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • As required by special education law, children should be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible and when appropriate.
    • Vision and hearing consultants should be a part of the child's IEP team to support access to academic material.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Motor Dysfunction

Gross motor dysfunction

  • Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility and to reduce the risk for later-onset orthopedic complications (e.g., contractures, scoliosis, hip dislocation).
  • Consider use of durable medical equipment and positioning devices as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).

Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.

Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.

Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., Augmentative and Alternative Communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory