Gabriele-De Vries Syndrome
Summary
Clinical characteristics.
Gabriele-de Vries syndrome is characterized by mild-to-profound developmental delay / intellectual disability (DD/ID) in all affected individuals and a wide spectrum of functional and morphologic abnormalities. Intrauterine growth restriction or low birth weight and feeding difficulties are common. Congenital brain, eye, heart, kidney, genital, and/or skeletal system anomalies have also been reported. About half of affected individuals have neurologic manifestations, including hypotonia and gait abnormalities. Behavioral issues can include attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, autism or autistic behavior, and schizoaffective disorder.
Diagnosis/testing.
The diagnosis of Gabriele-de Vries syndrome is established in a proband by the identification of a heterozygous pathogenic variant involving YY1 or a heterozygous deletion of 14q32.2 involving only YY1.
Management.
Treatment of manifestations: Developmental delay / intellectual disability, craniofacial anomalies (Pierre Robin sequence, cleft palate, craniosynostosis, abnormalities of the lacrimal duct), feeding difficulties, gastroesophageal reflux, constipation, seizures, behavioral manifestations, strabismus, refractive error, congenital heart defects, renal anomalies, cryptorchidism, and skeletal anomalies are treated per standard practice.
Surveillance: Of clinical manifestations as clinically indicated.
Genetic counseling.
Gabriele-de Vries syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. All probands reported to date with Gabriele-de Vries syndrome whose parents have undergone molecular genetic testing have the disorder as a result of a de novo YY1 pathogenic variant or deletion. Risk to future pregnancies is presumed to be low as the proband most likely has a de novo YY1 pathogenic variant or deletion; however, given the theoretic possibility of parental germline mosaicism, recurrence risk to sibs is estimated at 1%, and thus prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing may be considered.
Diagnosis
No formal clinical diagnostic criteria exist for Gabriele-de Vries syndrome.
Suggestive Findings
The clinical spectrum of Gabriele-de Vries syndrome is variable. Gabriele-de Vries syndrome should be considered in individuals presenting with the following clinical findings.
Clinical findings
- Mild-to-profound developmental delay and/or intellectual disability; AND
- Any of the following features presenting in infancy or childhood:
- Craniofacial dysmorphisms (see Clinical Description)
- Intrauterine growth restriction / low birth weight
- Feeding difficulties
- Neurologic abnormalities (hypotonia, abnormalities of movement, gait abnormalities)
- Behavioral problems (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, autism or autistic behavior, schizoaffective disorder)
- Congenital brain, eye, heart, kidney, genital, and/or skeletal system anomalies (see Clinical Description)
Establishing the Diagnosis
The diagnosis of Gabriele-de Vries syndrome is established in a proband who has one of the following on molecular genetic testing (see Table 1):
- A heterozygous pathogenic variant involving YY1
- A heterozygous deletion of 14q32.2 involving YY1 only
Note: See Genetically Related Disorders for information about deletions of 14q32.2 that involve YY1 and other, adjacent genes.
Molecular genetic testing in a child with developmental delay or an older individual with intellectual disability typically begins with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). If CMA is not diagnostic, the next step is typically either a multigene panel or exome sequencing. Note: Single-gene testing (sequence analysis ofYY1, followed by gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis) is rarely useful and typically NOT recommended.
- Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (including YY1) that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.Note: To date, most individuals with a YY1 deletion have been identified by CMA performed in the context of evaluation for developmental delay, intellectual disability, or autism spectrum disorder; however, many CMA platforms do not include sufficient coverage for this region and thus a YY1 deletion may not be detected.
- An intellectual disability (ID) multigene panel that includes YY1 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition in a person with a non-diagnostic CMA at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. Of note, given the rarity of YY1, some panels for ID may not include this gene. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests. For this disorder an ID multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (see Table 1).For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
- Exome sequencing, which does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved, yields results similar to an ID multigene panel but has two advantages: (1) a multigene panel may not include all rare genes recently identified as causing ID; and (2) exome sequencing may be able to detect pathogenic variants in genes that – for technical reasons – do not sequence well.If exome sequencing is not diagnostic – and particularly when evidence supports autosomal dominant inheritance – exome array (when clinically available) may be considered to detect (multi)exon deletions or duplications that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Gabriele-de Vries Syndrome
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method |
---|---|---|
YY1 | Sequence analysis 3 | 10/10 4 |
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5, 6 | None reported 4, 7 |
- 1.
See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.
- 2.
See Molecular Genetics for information on allelic variants detected in this gene.
- 3.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
- 4.
Gabriele et al [2017]
- 5.
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Gene-targeted deletion/duplication testing will detect deletions ranging from a single exon to the whole gene; however, breakpoints of large deletions and/or deletion of adjacent genes (e.g., those described by Gabriele et al [2017]) may not be detected by these methods.
- 6.
Targeted deletion testing is not appropriate for an individual in whom a pathogenic YY1 deletion was not detected by CMA designed to target chr14:100,705,102-100,745,371 region (GRCh37).
- 7.
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (includingYY1) that cannot be detected by sequence analysis. Approximately 13 individuals who have larger deletions of 14q32.2 that include YY1 and other, adjacent genes have been identified through CMA analysis (see Genetically Related Disorders) [Gabriele et al 2017].
Clinical Characteristics
Differential Diagnosis
The phenotypic features associated with Gabriele-de Vries syndrome are not sufficient to diagnose this condition clinically; therefore, all disorders with intellectual disability (ID) and congenital anomalies should be considered in the differential diagnosis. To date more than 180 such disorders with ID have been identified. See OMIM Phenotypic Series: Autosomal dominant ID; Autosomal recessive ID; and Syndromic X-linked ID.
Management
Evaluations and Referrals Following Initial Diagnosis
Evaluation by a multidisciplinary team can be beneficial.
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with Gabriele-de Vries syndrome, the evaluations summarized Table 2 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.
Note: Some evaluations are age dependent and may not be relevant at the time of initial diagnosis.
Table 2.
Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis of Gabriele-de Vries Syndrome
System/Concern | Evaluation | Comment |
---|---|---|
Neurodevelopmental | Developmental assessment | To incl eval of motor, speech/language, general cognitive, & vocational skills |
Craniofacial | Clinical eval for cleft palate &/or micrognathia | Refer to multidisciplinary craniofacial team if cleft palate &/or micrognathia present. 1 |
Clinical assessment for craniosynostosis | Refer to multidisciplinary craniofacial team for facial asymmetry / abnormal head shape or size. | |
Constitutional | Assessment of growth parameters to identify children w/low birth weight &/or short stature | Consider endocrinologic eval, incl thyroid function tests & growth hormone assessment. |
Gastrointestinal | Assessment of feeding difficulties |
|
Assessment for gastroesophageal reflux disease & constipation | Consider referral to gastroenterologist, if severe. | |
Neurologic | Neurologic eval 2 |
|
Behavioral/ Psychiatric | Consider neuropsychiatric eval. | Screen persons age >12 mos for behavior concerns incl sleep disturbances, ADHD, anxiety, &/or traits suggestive of ASD. |
Ophthalmologic | Consider referral to ophthalmologist. | For eval of strabismus &/or refraction errors |
Cardiac | Consider echocardiography to evaluate for congenital heart defects. | Refer to pediatric cardiologist. |
Renal | Consider baseline renal ultrasound. | To assess for renal anomalies |
Genital | Clinical eval of cryptorchidism or other penile or scrotal anomalies in boys | Consider referral to pediatric urologist if cryptorchidism present. |
Musculoskeletal | Clinical eval for skeletal abnormalities | Consider referral to an orthopedist if abnormalities present. |
Miscellaneous/Other | Consultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselor |
ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD = autism spectrum disorder
- 1.
Including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, speech pathologists, geneticists, pediatricians, orthodontists, and other craniofacial specialists
- 2.
Assessment of hypotonia, movement disorders, gait abnormalities, and history of possible seizures
Treatment of Manifestations
Table 3.
Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with Gabriele-de Vries Syndrome
Manifestation/Concern | Treatment | Considerations/Other |
---|---|---|
Cleft palate | Surgical repair | Per multidisciplinary craniofacial team 1 |
Craniosynostosis | Surgical repair, as needed | Per a multidisciplinary craniofacial team 1 |
Feeding difficulties | Feeding therapy &/or dietary measures | Gastrostomy tube placement may be required for persistent feeding problems. |
Gastroesophageal reflux disease &/or constipation | Standard mgmt & treatment(s) | Consider referral to a gastroenterologist, if severe. |
Seizures | Standardized treatment w/AEDs by experienced neurologist 2 | Many AEDs may be effective; no one AED has been demonstrated effective specifically for this disorder. |
Behavioral/psychiatric abnormalities | Appropriate behavior mgmt strategies &/or psychotropic medications, per psychiatrist | |
Strabismus &/or refraction abnormalities | Routine mgmt for ophthalmologic problems | |
Congenital heart defects | Routine treatment for cardiac abnormalities | |
Renal structural anomalies | Routine mgmt for renal abnormalities | |
Cryptorchidism | Routine mgmt for cryptorchidism | |
Skeletal anomalies | Standard treatment as recommended by orthopedist |
AED = antiepileptic drug
- 1.
Including plastic surgeons, pediatricians, orthodontists, and other craniofacial specialists
- 2.
Education of parents regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for parents or caregivers of children diagnosed with epilepsy, see Epilepsy & My Child Toolkit.
Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues
The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.
Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states.
Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed.
Ages 5-21 years. In the US, an IEP based on the individual's level of function should be developed by the local public school district. Affected children are permitted to remain in the public school district until age 21.
All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies and to support parents in maximizing quality of life.
Consideration of private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs is recommended. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
In the US:
- Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
- Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.
Motor Dysfunction
Gross motor dysfunction
- Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility.
- Consider use of durable medical equipment as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).
Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.
Oral motor dysfunction. Assuming that the individual is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy – typically from an occupational or speech therapist – is recommended for affected individuals who have difficulty feeding due to poor oral motor control.
Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., Augmentative and Alternative Communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties.
Social/Behavioral Concerns
Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and is typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.
Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat ADHD, when necessary.
Surveillance
A developmental pediatrician or a geneticist should coordinate the follow up of a child with Gabriele-de Vries syndrome. Surveillance of gastrointestinal, craniofacial, cardiac, renal, genital, skeletal, and endocrine abnormalities should be tailored to the affected individual according to the specific problems identified at diagnosis.
Long-term follow up by other specialists is also recommended and includes the following.
Table 4.
Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with Gabriele-de Vries Syndrome
System/Concern | Evaluation | Frequency |
---|---|---|
Constitutional | Measurement of growth parameters | At each visit until adulthood |
Neurologic | Monitor those w/seizures | As clinically indicated |
Assessment of neurologic disease progression | At each visit beginning in childhood | |
Psychiatric | Behavioral assessment for anxiety, attention, & aggressive or self-injurious behavior | At each visit beginning in childhood |
Ophthalmologic | Ophthalmologic evaluation | As needed based on symptoms |
Miscellaneous/ Other | Monitor developmental progress & educational needs | At each visit |
Evaluation of Relatives at Risk
See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.
Therapies Under Investigation
Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.